Let me reiterate, the intent and purpose of the Shaw amendment is of the highest import, because we have attempted in different ways to parallel that intent in language that we have already incorporated either in the basic bill or in amendments to that bill. All of us are interested in making certain of the priority, highest priority for support payments. I still have reservations about the workability of the amendment that the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw) has offered, but he has now created new language which may make it more acceptable. I will continue to monitor it between now and the time of conference and work with the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw) for even more perfect language, for the perfection that he has already accomplished, and still reserve the right to work against it if I think it hurts the overall concept of the bill. In other words, I do not know where I am on the gentleman's amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Shaw amendment and its implications for support payments during legislative debate.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
Mr. Chairman, everyone in the country knows that the status quo in the Immigration and Naturalization Service cannot be maintained. We must change it. We were taking a bold step today consistent with other studies and other precedents set…
soon after the tragic events of September 11, I went down to the Pentagon so that I could witness firsthand the destruction that was visited upon that spectacular building. As I made my way through the security lines and came to the…
Hershey, Pennsylvania, of course, is known throughout the world as the chocolate capital of the world, but there is another institution in Hershey which also is well known and well accepted in the larger community. That is the Penn State…
The game is just beginning. We are in the first inning of what may turn out to be a long game in trying to overturn this decision by the Ninth Circuit. We must remember that this was only a three-judge panel, not representing necessarily…





