Mr. Chairman, the fullest expectation we have for H.R. 3150 is that in the long run, the provisions that we are going to put into the law will reduce the increase for sure of filings for bankruptcy, and with great luck, with the economy continuing to buzz on as it is, that we will actually be able to reduce the number of filings total across the land. While we are doing that, a natural accompaniment to that will be lower costs, lower costs to the taxpayers, lower costs to the consumers, lower costs to the interest lenders and creditors, and an impetus to further expansion of the economy. That is why we say, in opposition to this amendment, that it is premature to add on a fail-safe for a possible cost that may or may not occur. On that basis, if we were to adopt this amendment, we who proposed these reforms, who want to reform the bankruptcy system, are second-guessing ourselves. We are saying we do not know if it is going to work or not. We know it is going to work.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the expected impact of H.R. 3150 on bankruptcy filings and costs.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
soon after the tragic attacks on our institutions on September 11, as everyone knows, our economy began to sink, to plummet to depths that we could not have foreseen. While we were struggling to right our ship, as it were, the OPEC nations…
I think the gentleman would feel better if he recognizes, as I do, that in this bill there is a continued movement by the farm communities towards market orientation, and that should help the gentleman.
I myself a few months ago was part of a scenario in which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued what it felt was a credible threat to Three Mile Island and reported the essence of that credible threat to the operators of Three Mile…
I want to speak about the AMVETS who, in Pennsylvania, throughout the time that I served in the legislature, continuously participated in legislative action that pertained to veterans. On the question of veterans preference in civil…





