Two interesting contentions that have been made throughout this debate from the very first moment we began the process in late 1997. One is the continuous lament from the other side of the aisle that it is not bipartisan in its offering, in its substance or in its support. Yet we took great pains to entertain as many Democrats as possible in a Republican atmosphere to provide a bipartisan vehicle for our consideration and that has reached us here today: bipartisan in sponsorship, bipartisan in sponsorship of underlying bills which were incorporated into our bill, and bipartisan in those who came forward to say to us, let me speak in favor of 3150 and let me speak in opposition to the Nadler substitute. So there is a bipartisanship that has played its role throughout this process.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the bipartisan nature of a bankruptcy reform bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I support this measure because, parochially speaking, it does a great deal for some of the projects in which we are so interested in Pennsylvania. For instance, at Fort Indiantown Gap, this calls for full funding of an…
It unifies our soldiers in the midst of battle and provides the direction and morale they need to protect our freedom. It unifies our citizens in times of trouble and gives us reason to reflect on and celebrate our freedom. It is our…
There is an extra benefit that is being conferred by passage of this bill and that is to our veterans. Veterans are experiencing two phenomena that we can help remove here tonight. One is the higher cost of medications that they are…
I rise to pose some reflections on the VFW. Many people will recall historically that during the Truman years there was an act of terrorism right in this Chamber, when terrorists of a different era shot up the entire Chamber here, wounding…





