I come to this debate with a tremendous prejudice which is born of the fact that I am a son of immigrants and the cousin of immigrants and the nephew of immigrants and distant relative to many immigrants. One would believe at the outset that I would be supporting any measure to retain the present system of legal immigration and allow all people who want to come to our Nation to safely arrive and begin to become American citizens. That prejudice I must set aside in the greater good of our country, and as a responsible public official, which I deem myself to be, I know that the time has come that we must do something about the total number of individuals who live in our country, or who will be coming into our country. So I am willing to set that prejudice aside for the time being for the purposes of this debate, not just for the time being but for a final conclusion of a bill that will do something about the sheer weight of numbers that we have of people in this country. The other prejudice I have, I must confess, is in favor of the bill as it came out of the Committee on the Judiciary. Why am I prejudiced in favor of the bill? It does seek to do exactly what I feel must be done, namely, to corral the gigantic numbers that we can foresee as future residents of our country; to lasso that in so we can control it better is a proper policy target for the Congress of the United States.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing immigration policy and the need to manage the number of individuals entering the country.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I support this measure because, parochially speaking, it does a great deal for some of the projects in which we are so interested in Pennsylvania. For instance, at Fort Indiantown Gap, this calls for full funding of an…
This legislation was not born of a whim or out of reason of trying to fill a day of litigation where other things could not have been accomplished. This came about as a result of a Federal judge who was shocked by the fact that on certain…
the inclusion of the extension of unemployment compensation benefits in this bill, of course, is the core, and it is a pretty good outcome for our unemployed. I would have added one feature to it which I presented to the Committee on Rules…
I introduced H.R. 1209, the ``Child Status Protection Act'', in March of 2001 along with Sheila Jackson Lee. I was moved by stories of the children of U.S. citizens, constituents of my own and of other members, who were being punished…





