Seizing back my time, Mr. Chairman, no, the gentleman is not correct. Here is the way I would paint that. The gentleman is looking at it from the standpoint of the defendant, as you call him, the wrongdoer, but our whole system of justice calls out for the plaintiff, the claimant, to be reimbursed in full. Nowhere does it say that he should be double dipping, that he should have a double recovery. If the result of what we are doing here is to eliminate that double dipping, even if it inures to the benefit of lower premiums for medical liability, both for the hospitals and the doctors, then the wrongdoer is not benefiting from that. The general public is, because their doctors and their hospitals will be able to purchase insurance for a lesser amount, thus making the cost of hospital service less.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legal reforms on medical liability and insurance costs.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
we have seen a bevy of cases in which corporate executives plunder their own business, work with insiders, and do dastardly things in their business world. We have seen them use every kind of device known to mankind to avoid their…
I think the gentleman would feel better if he recognizes, as I do, that in this bill there is a continued movement by the farm communities towards market orientation, and that should help the gentleman.
Yesterday, I introduced a piece of legislation that would have the result of eliminating income taxes on unemployment compensation benefits. Since 1986 that had been a part of the tax structure of our country, that even those who have lost…
When we began this odyssey on bankruptcy reform some 5 years ago, we began with two staunch principles guiding our pathway. One was to guarantee that those who are so overburdened, so swamped, so flooded with financial obligations that…





