Yes. That is borne out by this fact, I say to the gentleman from Pennsylvania, that indeed even though the Attorney General, the current incumbent, in effect was hedging as to whether or not to appoint a special counsel and was receiving undoubtedly signals from the White House as to what to do or not to do, finally, after denying the need for it, acceded to a special counsel. There would have been no need for that. The hue and cry would have been so overwhelming if a good independent counsel statute had been in effect, that that would have automatically occurred, the Attorney General would have done a preliminary investigation and the court would have appointed him.
Hon. George W. Gekas: “Yes. That is borne out by this fact, I say to the gentleman from Pennsylvania, that indeed even though the Attorney…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need for an independent counsel statute in light of the Attorney General's actions.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I myself a few months ago was part of a scenario in which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued what it felt was a credible threat to Three Mile Island and reported the essence of that credible threat to the operators of Three Mile…
I think the gentleman would feel better if he recognizes, as I do, that in this bill there is a continued movement by the farm communities towards market orientation, and that should help the gentleman.
It is on the creditor, and that really conforms to the general state of the law in such cases. There has to be affirmative evidence of fraud having been committed so that the creditor must come forth.
I want to substantiate my support for the amendment and to urge that everyone consider the question of unaccompanied young children and the provision of legal assistance in their quest to remain in the United States.





