Yes. That is borne out by this fact, I say to the gentleman from Pennsylvania, that indeed even though the Attorney General, the current incumbent, in effect was hedging as to whether or not to appoint a special counsel and was receiving undoubtedly signals from the White House as to what to do or not to do, finally, after denying the need for it, acceded to a special counsel. There would have been no need for that. The hue and cry would have been so overwhelming if a good independent counsel statute had been in effect, that that would have automatically occurred, the Attorney General would have done a preliminary investigation and the court would have appointed him.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need for an independent counsel statute in light of the Attorney General's actions.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
this proposed ban aids the criminal and hits the law-abiding citizen squarely in the face, and the criminal sprints away laughing at the whole scene, because it is the law-abiding citizen whose rights have been hurt. To what avail is this…
Mr. Speaker, a long time ago the Congress passed a statute to bind itself on a fiscal year to complete its appropriations by September 30 of every year. That is the law. Congress passed the law against itself to bind itself. Almost every…
At this very moment, Pennsylvania is being hit yet again with a severe winter storm, the proportions of which are yet to accumulate in the Commonwealth. This brings us to a point where we must repeat the history of this winter thus far for…
I am hopeful that as the Members come to the floor, they will picture in their mind the following scene. A high-ranking, high-profile Member of Congress is accused of wrongdoing in one form or another, and that accusation, that allegation…





