what we are saying is that the final verdict of the jury is, in effect, if it finds against the plaintiff, if it finds zero, that is prima facie evidence for the late determination as to whether or not attorney's fees and so forth should be paid, that it was nonmeritorious. It had no merit or else it would not have resulted in a zero judgment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a jury's verdict in relation to attorney's fees.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I want to substantiate my support for the amendment and to urge that everyone consider the question of unaccompanied young children and the provision of legal assistance in their quest to remain in the United States.
recently, back in my district in central Pennsylvania, I had occasion in connection with the armed services holidays and celebrations to appear with a group of women right in the center of the action of Harrisburg, at the capital area, who…
we have seen a bevy of cases in which corporate executives plunder their own business, work with insiders, and do dastardly things in their business world. We have seen them use every kind of device known to mankind to avoid their…
Had we had an opportunity to try to amend this bill that this rule provides for, I would have offered an amendment to lift the income tax on the unemployment compensation that many people have been receiving and, nevertheless, have to pay…





