What we are saying is that the final verdict of the jury is, in effect, if it finds against the plaintiff, if it finds zero, that is prima facie evidence for the late determination as to whether or not attorney's fees and so forth should be paid, that it was nonmeritorious. It had no merit or else it would not have resulted in a zero judgment.
Hon. George W. Gekas: “What we are saying is that the final verdict of the jury is, in effect, if it finds against the plaintiff, if it finds…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a jury's verdict in relation to attorney's fees.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
The point is that transfers being a way of life, it is possible that the capital gains tax relief that is granted to people otherwise would not be granted to a member of the armed services because of the rapid transferability of every…
What is missing from all of this discussion is the fact that all of us, every American, is interested in environmental quality. We do not want anything but clean air and clean water and a good area in which to live. But we are in a state…
It is on the creditor, and that really conforms to the general state of the law in such cases. There has to be affirmative evidence of fraud having been committed so that the creditor must come forth.
I have a peculiar and unique interest in William Penn, in that after completion of junior high school, the high school I entered was aptly named for these proceedings, William Penn High School. It was then that I first learned of the life…





