Mr. Chairman, a vote for the Schumer-Conyers-Chapman amendment is a vote of no confidence in the local public officials. Your mayors, your township officials, your municipal officers elected by the voters to make decisions at their level on what is best for their streets, for their neighborhoods, for their public safety contingents, this constitutes no confidence in them and, as a matter of fact, a condemnation of their abilities to govern their own municipalities. That is the difference that we are trying to determine over on this side when we offer this elastic, flexible program which will allow these local officials to respond to their local voters and taxpayers. Now, what is the difference between what we are attempting to do here and what occurred under LEAA? That was a bipartisan measure, as I remember, and that served its purpose at that time. If there was any difference between that and this which you now decry, you on the other side of the aisle, it might be this: that today we have the expanded coverage of C-SPAN, we have total communications from individual Members of Congress to their constituents and vice versa.
Editor's note · Context
Debating the Schumer-Conyers-Chapman amendment and its implications for local public officials.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
recently, back in my district in central Pennsylvania, I had occasion in connection with the armed services holidays and celebrations to appear with a group of women right in the center of the action of Harrisburg, at the capital area, who…
My biggest fear that it might not pass is that it makes sense. The bill makes adequate, perfect common sense. That has always been a drawback to final successful passage of legislation as we have noted over the years. Why does it make…
I have a peculiar and unique interest in William Penn, in that after completion of junior high school, the high school I entered was aptly named for these proceedings, William Penn High School. It was then that I first learned of the life…
This legislation was not born of a whim or out of reason of trying to fill a day of litigation where other things could not have been accomplished. This came about as a result of a Federal judge who was shocked by the fact that on certain…





