what we are really saying--I do want to predict how the argument is going to go later when the amendment process begins. The gentleman is saying that the present language, not the Michigan rule, but the present language, is more likely to deter frivolous suits because the gap between the $49,999 and the $100,000 is so great that that proves that the plaintiff should not recover because it is more or less frivolous or----
Discussing the implications of language in a legislative amendment process.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
I believe it was in the first week in which I operated as an assistant district attorney in Dauphin County in Pennsylvania when I had the duty of supervising an investigation and a court setting for a case evolving from wiretapping; and it…
I want to speak about the AMVETS who, in Pennsylvania, throughout the time that I served in the legislature, continuously participated in legislative action that pertained to veterans. On the question of veterans preference in civil…
Mr. Speaker, the public demands that we do something about child pornography, and the type that now has beset us across the Internet world is even worse than some of the expected child pornography that we have contemplated over the years…
the value of this resolution is cast in a way that its failure to be enacted by this Congress would make havoc reign in the House of Representatives. What do I mean by that? If we should fail to adopt this resolution and some new terror…
Other voices in this conversation
