What I would respond is that the telecommunication companies at the request of their government were asked to cooperate and help us pursue terrorists. Obviously they have much of the infrastructure that we need to pursue these terrorists. I would have to put this whole issue under the category of ``no good deed goes unpunished,'' where people who are acting in good faith to help their government are now being sued for their efforts, again to protect the most litigious elements of our society. Because of that, because of the failure to provide a retroactive immunity as contained in the Protect America Act, when we do not provide that retroactive immunity, we know that these telecommunications can no longer be good partners. Even though they want to be helpful, they can't be. They have to protect themselves from lawsuits. They have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to protect themselves and their organizations. I think that is really what is driving us.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of telecommunications companies in national security and the need for retroactive immunity.
Share
More from CHARLES W. DENT
The big problem with Georgia law, which she did not mention, as far as I'm concerned, was that they really removed the secretary of state from the election board. That was a punitive measure.
America has abandoned the post-World War II global order it has led for the past 80 years.
We have to rid ourselves of these radical elements. I would recommend to every one of my Republican colleagues, sometimes you have to risk your job in order to save it. Well, this is the time.
I think it's really -- to me, it's so sad that so many of my former colleagues would stand up and more or less embrace Vladimir Putin's view and Putin, he simply wants to undermine American power and influence anywhere in the world.





