Thank you. I just wanted to address a couple of issues about the EPA. I've tried to point out, very thoughtfully, that the EPA has failed really to properly address the economic impact of this proposed rule. It is critically flawed. Let me restate once again why this rule is so flawed. Because it does bring together, cobbles together, a range of different performance characteristics for different pollutants without determining if it is possible for any single cement plant to comply with these standards simultaneously. That is the problem. My distinguished colleague from California is making a point that there will be less emissions. That is true. Because there will be fewer plants. They will not be emitting anything. We expect 18 plants that may be shuttered out of the 90 in this country; tremendous capital investment for an industry critical to our basic infrastructure. These are high-paying jobs that we're talking about. We can't afford to lose that many more. That industry has become much more efficient over the years. These plants today produce far more than numerous plants would have produced years ago. I just can't emphasize enough that as we are having this great debate about the nature of the economy and jobs, that we would be willfully using regulatory agencies that we know are going to cost thousands of jobs in America, high-paying jobs. When is enough enough?
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing concerns about the economic impact of EPA regulations on the cement industry.
Share
More from CHARLES W. DENT
For the former President to go out there and say that all Americans are under attack. Well, that's absurd, because they're not under attack.
Doing nothing is not an option and will in fact lead to a massive benefit cut should Social Security go insolvent.
Unfortunately, for House Republicans, it will be them. Because you have Senate Republicans and Democrats united, House Democrats are aligned with the Senate and the president and it is really just a handful of House Republicans who are…
It's unclear whether that message will work. It might. It worked for say, Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania against Doug Mastriano, where Shapiro talked about democracy and threats, the peaceful transfers of power, rule of law, the…





