I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to amend portions of the bill not yet read. Section 17 of chapter 2 of the House Practice book states in part: ``It is not in order to strike or otherwise amend portions of a bill not yet read for amendment.'' I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
On the recordApril 29, 2015
Share
More from CHARLES W. DENT
Jan 2, 2023
I mean, again, why would Kevin McCarthy hand the rope to his opponents with which they could hang him? That's really what he is doing.
Jan 26, 2022
This is not a time for Americans that behave like that. We have an obligation. Our leadership has made a difference in Europe. It is peaceful and stable and we shouldn't just assume it is always going to be this way. Putin is trying to…
Jun 6, 2024
It's unclear whether that message will work. It might. It worked for say, Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania against Doug Mastriano, where Shapiro talked about democracy and threats, the peaceful transfers of power, rule of law, the…
Feb 9, 2021
If this were a secret ballot vote, I'd bet there'll be over 80 votes to convict the President.





