I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to amend portions of the bill not yet read. Section 17 of chapter 2 of the House Practice book states in part: ``It is not in order to strike or otherwise amend portions of a bill not yet read for amendment.'' I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
Share
More from CHARLES W. DENT
They need to move away from that and get serious about negotiating more barriers, more beds, more immigration judges, technology, as Maria said drones.
It's clear that Joe Biden is trying to appeal. I think to what he might see as persuadable voters. But it's important to remember that many persuadable voters are somewhat transactional.
There's no path to victory for Kamala Harris without Pennsylvania, and Josh Shapiro, I think adds more value because he was very strong, particularly in the Philadelphia market.
It's unclear whether that message will work. It might. It worked for say, Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania against Doug Mastriano, where Shapiro talked about democracy and threats, the peaceful transfers of power, rule of law, the…
Other voices in this conversation
