On the recordMay 18, 2016
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, accordingly, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment gives affirmative direction in effect. So I would ask for a ruling from the Chair. The CHAIR. Does the gentleman from Louisiana wish to be heard on the point of order?
