This amendment is familiar to us since the gentleman offered it last year. I am not sure it is necessary to repeat the language this year since we know the VA has rescinded the Fast Letter guidance. After all, with the IG investigation into the dual scheduling systems, it doesn't seem likely that the VA is maintaining recordkeeping systems that are not approved by headquarters; but I am not going to object to the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time.
CHARLES W. DENT: “This amendment is familiar to us since the gentleman offered it last year. I am not sure it is necessary to repeat the…”
On the recordMay 19, 2016
Share
More from CHARLES W. DENT
Dec 21, 2023
They need to move away from that and get serious about negotiating more barriers, more beds, more immigration judges, technology, as Maria said drones.
Apr 30, 2025
Doing nothing is not an option and will in fact lead to a massive benefit cut should Social Security go insolvent.
Nov 12, 2024
I mean, this is a gobsmackingly bad nomination. I mean, I would be less surprised, in the words of Chevy Chase if my face was stapled to the floor. I mean, this is really a bad nomination. I can't imagine any circumstance under which Matt…
Jun 6, 2024
It's clear that Joe Biden is trying to appeal. I think to what he might see as persuadable voters. But it's important to remember that many persuadable voters are somewhat transactional.





