Mr. Chairman, we have proceeded in this conversation as if it is an either/or proposition. I would argue that it really is not. The purpose for this complaint and the protest is that we wanted an amendment made in order for the gentlewoman from California so that we could put it into the supplemental appropriation to increase resources for drug treatment. Now, it is true that a large amount of cocaine and heroin travels from Colombia to this country, but it is also true that those are not the only drugs that are causing problems for us here in America. There are domestically generated drugs, like methamphetamines. There are all kinds of other drugs. We have a serious problem of marijuana being grown here domestically. There are household inhalants that our children are using and, in some cases, killing themselves and destroying their potential. So it is not just a matter of cocaine or heroin, number one, when we talk about drugs. The question of treatment is a question of common sense and cost-effectiveness. We know that treatment works. We know that there are millions of Americans, 3 million in the latest study, that do not have access to treatment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for increased resources for drug treatment during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from Chaka Fattah
I concur with the gentleman's amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Reclaiming my time, I appreciate your answering my question. So what I hear is that you held some hearings, that you have legislation, that you are making progress, and that the administration has already curtailed some of these practices…
Can I inquire how much time is remaining. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Pennsylvania has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Iowa will be postponed. {time} 1645 Amendment Offered by Mr. King of Iowa





