Let me speak briefly on this matter. I thank the gentlelady for bringing this amendment. The Constitution of our United States, which was written in Philadelphia, suggests three branches of government--the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. I would oppose an amendment like this in a Democratic-majority Congress trying to impede a Republican administration's Justice Department from acting to, in their belief, represent the legitimate, authentic view of the Constitution in a Federal matter. To fight in court is one thing. To take away someone's right to have a lawyer--that is to say, the Justice Department can't go into court on behalf of the executive branch when they feel the Constitution is being violated--I think is a bad precedent. I think that for those who are interested in protecting and upholding our Constitution, to support it, this is a vote that you will regret having on your record as you look back on your service in the Congress. I yield back the balance of my time.
On the recordMay 8, 2012
Share
More from Chaka Fattah
Jun 3, 2015
I thank the gentleman for yielding me the time in that colloquy. I look forward to being able to do the same in return, but I do appreciate the opportunity to communicate with my colleague, because I don't want anyone to misinterpret the…
Jun 3, 2015
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Iowa will be postponed. {time} 1645 Amendment Offered by Mr. King of Iowa
Jun 3, 2015
Reclaiming my time, I appreciate your answering my question. So what I hear is that you held some hearings, that you have legislation, that you are making progress, and that the administration has already curtailed some of these practices…





