Political Quotes

On the recordApril 3, 1995
I thank the Chair. It was almost 25 years ago that I traveled around the country with my good friend, the senior Senator from Massachusetts. I was then on the Labor and Public Welfare Committee. He was, I believe, chairman of the Health Subcommittee. We were doing health hearings around the country going to hospitals, holding hearings. There is no question that his compassion for the poor is unrivaled in this body. Sometimes, however, that compassion is confused by the volume of his oratory and the velocity of his statistics. Volume and velocity are not necessarily accuracy. He uses the word ``cut, cut, cut.'' Only in this Government--not in any State government that I know--only in this Government do we use the word ``cut'' as follows: cut means we are going to spend less than we thought we were going to spend in the future, even though it is more than we are spending now. That is a cut. This would be a cut, to an average layperson. I am making $1,000 a month. I think I am worth $1,200 a month. I go to the boss and say, I am worth $1,200. And the boss says I don't have $1,200. I will give you $1,100. You do not tell your wife you got cut $200; you got $100 raise. It is not as much as you hoped but more than you are getting. I defy you to ask any average normal citizen in this country to define ``cut'' the way we define it. Having said that, we will take a look at the quantity of money we now spend.…
Said by
Robert Packwood
Republican · Oregon

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the definition of budget cuts in government spending.

Share

More from Robert Packwood

Mar 16, 1994

this is a simple amendment and it calls for a study. It does not call for expenditure of any money other than what the study may cost. It is an amendment to require the Small Business Administration to conduct a study of the effects of the…

govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 1994

I feel some ambivalence toward my friend from Arizona. As he knows, I have cosponsored this before. Logic is totally on his side. Money is not. I know there is a disagreement in estimates. There is no question the bill has to lose some…

govinfo.gov
Feb 10, 1995

It was not President Reagan's fault, not really our fault. We were just wrong. The only reason I say that is because now we are not facing the same situation we were facing on projections in 1981. Now we are projecting $200 billion to $400…

govinfo.gov
Sep 6, 1995

State and local. We brought them in and, by 1960, most people were covered by Social Security and that included survivors. So if the breadwinner died, the widow and the orphan were taken care of. Therefore, welfare--I am not talking about…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation