I feel some ambivalence toward my friend from Arizona. As he knows, I have cosponsored this before. Logic is totally on his side. Money is not. I know there is a disagreement in estimates. There is no question the bill has to lose some money. Whether it loses $26.4 billion over 5 years as is estimated, or whether there will be a sufficient change of behavior so it loses less than that because people go to work and they pay taxes--I do not know. There is no question it loses some money. But logic and fairness is on the side of the Senator from Arizona. We do not say to somebody who has a private pension from an insurance company ``You have worked all your life. You retire when you are 65.'' The insurance company says ``We will pay you $1,000 a month. And, by the way, if you go to work after you have retired at Disney or McDonald's, we are going to reduce your insurance company pension a bit.'' We do not do that. And there is no reason why we should do it with Social Security. So, as I say, I come with some ambivalence. I know there is a loss of money and we will have to make up the money. But equity is on the side of the Senator from Arizona.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of a bill related to Social Security.
Share
More from Robert Packwood
So, let us go on down some other suggestions. Restrain spending. We all get this from home. If we just spent no more next year than we spend now, in 3 years we will balance the budget. If we spend no more than we spend now, we will balance…
the 1995 annual reports of the trustees on the status of the two Medicare trust funds, released on April 3, 1995, raise serious concerns about future financial viability of the Medicare Program. The trustees conclude that the Federal…
Give me control of the procedures of democracy, and I will control the substance of democracy.
It was not President Reagan's fault, not really our fault. We were just wrong. The only reason I say that is because now we are not facing the same situation we were facing on projections in 1981. Now we are projecting $200 billion to $400…





