I think it is important for Members to look at some of the legal liability issues involved in the Rohrabacher amendment. Clearly what it says is that school districts are in danger and could lose all of their Federal funding if they adopt as a policy or de facto not enforce the policy enunciated in the Rohrabacher amendment. Second, they do face losing all of their Federal funds if either a teacher or the district fails to follow up on an accusation made by either a student or a parent that a child in the district is here illegally in this country. Finally, I think the chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary's subcommittee alluded to this, but it is a question of how quickly will the ACLU or some other group bring a lawsuit against a school district or a teacher where there is a false accusation of a child being illegally in this country or where they are illegally here and dismissed from the school for that reason. This just invites very expensive lawsuits against the school district, and I think it is important just to get to the basic policy. We are not saying here that the respect for law is not important. We are saying here the issue before us is who is to enforce the law. That is where the solution lies. It is not with the children of America.
Michael Kopetski: “I think it is important for Members to look at some of the legal liability issues involved in the Rohrabacher amendment.…”
Editor's note · Context
Kopetski discusses the legal implications of the Rohrabacher amendment on school districts and federal funding.
Share
More from Michael Kopetski
Mr. Chairman, I want to reiterate one point for my colleagues: the death penalty is more expensive, not less, than life imprisonment. Again, estimates in California are that death penalty cases cost roughly $600,000, compared to $427,000…
I think it is ironic that those on the Republican side of the aisle who, for years, opposed the concept of the independent counsel, in fact allowed the laws under the independent counsel to expire this past December because of opposition…
Amendment offered by Mr. Kopetski: At the end of title X (page 277, after line 2), insert the following new section: SEC. . CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ON NEGOTIATION OF LIMITATIONS ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING. (a) Findings.--The Congress finds…
I rise to offer an amendment on behalf of myself and my good friends, the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. Mfume] and the gentleman from New York [Mr. Serrano]. The Kopetski-Mfume-Serrano amendment would, quite simply, strip out all the death…





