The announcement of an Executive order banning the use of replacement workers by Federal contractors disturbs me because it appears to circumvent congressional authority to amend this Nation's labor laws. Because of this concern, I support the effort to prevent the implementation and enforcement of this order. Nevertheless, I remain a supporter of legislative attempts that would amend the National Labor Relations Act and overturn Supreme Court decisions which have weakened what I believe to be the original intent of the law--to explicitly protect a worker's economic self-help activities through the right to strike.
Mark Hatfield: “The announcement of an Executive order banning the use of replacement workers by Federal contractors disturbs me because…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns over an Executive order related to labor laws and the right to strike.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
In Oregon, we are reducing our welfare roles by training our workers and putting people to work. This is being accomplished through a concerted effort of local, State and Federal officials striving together towards a common goal of putting…
Why can't the administration agree that these settlements are a national obligation now to be funded?
The bus and bus facilities distribution table included in the statement of managers accompanying the conference report--House Report 104-785--directs funds to Hood River, OR, for buses. However, it has lately been brought to my attention…
I can sympathize with the frustration expressed by the junior Senator from Florida on behalf of the Gainesville/Ocala communities and regional airport. If the FAA had recognized a legitimate need which still exists, I certainly think it…





