On the recordJanuary 1, 1989
Why can't the administration agree that these settlements are a national obligation now to be funded?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Hatfield questioned the administration's commitment to funding Indian water settlements.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
Feb 3, 1994
I thank the Senator, for this now gets to the heart of my concern. My State of Oregon has already developed an outstanding statewide educational improvement plan which I believe meets the aims of Goals 2000. There are other States in…
Feb 10, 1994
I am talking about options. I am not talking about actions but options. Is it also true that the managers of the bill have another option? We can call up these amendments in the absence of the author, and we could expedite this by taking…
Feb 1, 1994
in 1989, I joined with my colleague, Senator Lautenberg, in support of the retention of the standard of proof long required for certain categories of Soviet and Indochinese refugees who have faced continuing persecution. The so-called…
Mar 10, 1994
the Simpson amendment to the pending legislation, the National Competitiveness Act, includes important reforms to the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931. While I strongly support the continuation of the Davis-Bacon law, I do believe changes need to…
Other voices in this conversation
