Yes, you have requested additional funds for this project. However, criteria established in the One-hundred-and-fourth Congress by the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee of the House precludes me from being able to accommodate the Senator from Montana's request. The subcommittee has an ironclad rule that no highway projects which are not authorized be included for funding under the appropriations bill. In addition, no increases above the authorized levels will be included. Given the level of single-purpose projects included in ISTEA the ability of the Appropriations Committee to accommodate the Senator's request has been severely reduced, and such adjustments need to be made in the authorizing legislation.
Mark Hatfield: “Yes, you have requested additional funds for this project. However, criteria established in the One-hundred-and-fourth…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding limitations for highway projects during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
Mr. President, our negotiators in the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty conference are on the brink of success from many perspectives. The conference concludes at the end of this month, so in 3 days we will know if the goal that we have worked…
the fiscal year 1997 Agriculture appropriations report references a Grants to Broadcasting Systems Program that I would like to discuss with the chairman of the Agriculture Committee, Mr. Lugar, and with the Senator from North Dakota, Mr…
I assure my colleague from California that the committee report does not mean the committee does not support research funding for the ATTB. I point out that the report also states that the committee has not earmarked projects mentioned in…
Why can't the administration agree that these settlements are a national obligation now to be funded?





