Yes, you have requested additional funds for this project. However, criteria established in the One-hundred-and-fourth Congress by the Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee of the House precludes me from being able to accommodate the Senator from Montana's request. The subcommittee has an ironclad rule that no highway projects which are not authorized be included for funding under the appropriations bill. In addition, no increases above the authorized levels will be included. Given the level of single-purpose projects included in ISTEA the ability of the Appropriations Committee to accommodate the Senator's request has been severely reduced, and such adjustments need to be made in the authorizing legislation.
Mark Hatfield: “Yes, you have requested additional funds for this project. However, criteria established in the One-hundred-and-fourth…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding limitations for highway projects during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
I applaud the city's effort and support its proposal to proceed in the manner outlined by the Senator from Oklahoma.
I, again, express my deep appreciation for his collaboration, his cooperation, his spirit of friendship, and the demonstration of that friendship day in and day out in achieving our mutual responsibilities to bring this bill to the floor…
Considering the extensive discussions I know the two Senators from Michigan have conducted with their State and local governments over this proposal, I wish to assure both Senators that I will make every effort to ensure their proposal is…
TSA was, quote, governed by self-direction, end of quote, which, quote, bred misbehavior, quote, and led to toxicity rather than a healthy agency, end of quote.





