In effect, those the Senator has identified as requiring a period of time for debate--we both understand we do not know precisely how much time, but we know it is controversial enough that it will elicit debate--none of those amendments really are in the process; are they?
The speaker is discussing the need for debate on certain amendments identified by another senator.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
I applaud the city's effort and support its proposal to proceed in the manner outlined by the Senator from Oklahoma.
I feel strongly enough about it to be here to do two things; one, to support the amendment, but the other is to apologize to the chairman of the Subcommittee on Appropriations, Mr. McConnell, for offering a rider to an appropriations bill…
on February 8, 1995, I addressed the Senate regarding my views on a constitutional amendment that would require a balanced Federal budget. I stated at that time that I was opposed to an amendment to do something that can be done without a…
I, again, express my deep appreciation for his collaboration, his cooperation, his spirit of friendship, and the demonstration of that friendship day in and day out in achieving our mutual responsibilities to bring this bill to the floor…
Other voices in this conversation
