this bill we are considering today--to provide disabled veterans the same cost-of-living-adjustment as we give Social Security recipients--represents one of the most important contracts we must honor. That contract is the one we have with disabled veterans of our military services to enable their COLA's to keep up with the consumer price index. In my view, simply keeping up with inflation as this bill does, is only a bare minimum of what we owe our disabled veterans. They deserve more. As disabled veterans age, their disabilities often cause problems at an increasing rate. Therefore, we absolutely must increase their COLA's with the rate of inflation and we really should do more for them. I believe our priorities are wrong when we are spending $15 billion more on airlift than necessary by buying the enormously expensive C-17 air cargo plane. Our priorities are wrong when we are signing up for 20 more B-2 bombers that the Department of Defense does not even want at an eventual cost of at least $30 billion. Rather than waste more taxpayer dollars on these outmoded cold war systems, it is far more important for us to attempt to repay the debt we owe our disabled veterans and their survivors. They have made tremendous sacrifices on our behalf and we do not do enough for them. Before I close, I want to pay tribute to my colleague, Mr. Montgomery. He has worked incredibly hard on behalf of our Nation's veterans for many, many years.
Elizabeth Furse: “this bill we are considering today--to provide disabled veterans the same cost-of-living-adjustment as we give Social…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the importance of cost-of-living adjustments for disabled veterans.
Share
More from Elizabeth Furse
End this witch-hunt. End the malarkey on your side of the aisle, and let this investigation conclude and let Loretta Sanchez continue her fine work as representing the 46th District of California. Democrats are sending a simple message…
I am here to talk about the so-called forest recovery bill. This bill is bad for the environment and it is bad for the economy. The sponsors say it will fix environmental problems in the forest. But, in fact, it will harm our public…
It goes without saying that lying under oath is a serious offense. But even if the House of Representatives had the constitutional authority to impeach for any instance of perjury or obstruction of justice, a responsible House would not…
That is why I rise in support of the Castle amendment, which makes sense, and oppose the Istook amendment, which makes absolutely no sense. Why does it make no sense? I believe that the Istook amendment will actually increase teen…





