I am here to talk about the so-called forest recovery bill. This bill is bad for the environment and it is bad for the economy. The sponsors say it will fix environmental problems in the forest. But, in fact, it will harm our public forests. And because it is such a bad bill, we have a lot of people who are opposing it. The League of Conservation Voters have said they will score this as a key no vote. Who else is opposing the bill? Quite a lot of people: the Methodist Church, Taxpayers for Common Sense, the Presbyterian Church, Religious Center for Reformed Judaism, The National Audubon Society, and the US PIRGs. Sure, we do have environmental problems. But we are trying to fix those problems at a local level. We have hundreds of private-public partnerships working to fix those environmental approximate. What this bill is is a fix from Washington, D.C. We do not need a fix from Washington, D.C. We need to fix our environmental problems on the ground, people who understand, people who know the problems. So I say, vote no on H.R. 2515.
Elizabeth Furse: “I am here to talk about the so-called forest recovery bill. This bill is bad for the environment and it is bad for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the forest recovery bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Elizabeth Furse
for a number of years now I have been deeply concerned about the militarist government in Burma and by its repression of human and civil rights of the citizens of Burma. In particular, I have protested the many years of house arrests…
as cochair and cofounder of the Diabetes Caucus, I rise today to oppose H.R. 3717. I believe this bill has absolutely nothing to do with public health but everything to do with election year politics. Now if we want to reduce drug use, let…
I rise in support of the Luther-Ramstad amendment. We can safely reduce our fleet of Trident submarines to 10 and that will make us save $344 million. I would say that nuclear weapons are becoming obsolete, but that is not important. What…
I do not think we should talk so broadly about choice. It is a woman's choice and her family's choice and her physician's choice we are talking about. This has been, in my view, the most antichoice Congress that I have ever had the sadness…





