It seems to me we might be able to put that money to better use in doing some other research. Perhaps if we applied more money to research in these areas there would be greater gains. But we have had this animal predator control program since 1931, and we have today more coyotes in the United States than when they started the program but they are more dispersed, and there are other problems that have been a consequence, particularly inadvertent kills of nontarget species. Mr. Chairman, I had a constituent whose dog was killed, and when she ran to rescue the dog who had gotten into one of those M44 explosive devices, she also had a cyanide poisoning.
Elizabeth Furse: “It seems to me we might be able to put that money to better use in doing some other research. Perhaps if we applied more…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness and consequences of the animal predator control program.
Share
More from Elizabeth Furse
I thank the gentleman for caring about the kids of America. We really must keep them front and foremost in our minds.
My goodness, how quickly some people forget our history, but we Democrats do not forget. We remember that less than 100 years ago in Centralia, Washington three woodworkers were hanged because they tried to organize the timber industry…
I would like to say that I respect the long-standing commitment of the gentleman from Illinois and the gentleman from Massachusetts to this issue. It is my understanding that the bill before the House does not include any funding for this…
I am here to talk about the so-called forest recovery bill. This bill is bad for the environment and it is bad for the economy. The sponsors say it will fix environmental problems in the forest. But, in fact, it will harm our public…





