as part of the agreement on the Purchaser Road Credit that has been struck, I understand that several Members who would otherwise have supported this amendment are been forced to vote against my amendment. And so although 40 editorials across the country is a good beginning in educating the public and the House on the taxpayer losses associated with the commercial program, it is my understanding that the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter) and the gentleman from California (Mr. Miller) may revisit this issue next year. Mr. Chairman, I encourage the House to support fiscally and environmentally responsible forest management reform.
Elizabeth Furse: “as part of the agreement on the Purchaser Road Credit that has been struck, I understand that several Members who would…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Purchaser Road Credit and advocating for forest management reform.
Share
More from Elizabeth Furse
this resolution has two parts. Of course we support the troops, of course we do. But the second part of this resolution confirms that we should remove a ruler. I cannot believe it is in our best interests to decide who rules in what…
Mr. Chairman, there are tremendous parts in H.R. 3534. I think we do need to look at all the information when we make decisions. But the only problem is that we have seen some really terrible examples where something came through on a…
I am very interested in all this discussion about small farmers. I am probably one of the few small farmers in this body. I have a small farm. I sure do not get whole lots of Federal subsidies or insurance agents. I never heard of this…
That is why I rise in support of the Castle amendment, which makes sense, and oppose the Istook amendment, which makes absolutely no sense. Why does it make no sense? I believe that the Istook amendment will actually increase teen…





