one of my fundamental principles is that government not interfere with the basic freedoms of our families, and a basic freedom for the health of women includes reproductive health choices. This legislation threatens that freedom by inappropriately intervening in the decisions of patients and their doctors. Late-term abortions are, as has been demonstrated time and again, accepted medical practice that at times is the only procedure available to protect a woman's life and her ability to safely have a healthy baby in the future. Years ago, when we first started debating this legislation on the floor of this House, I was struck that while proponents try to horrify people, I was indeed struck by the real cases of real families that would be devastated by this amendment, as was pointed out by the gentlewoman from New York. This legislation further is part of an insidious ongoing assault to erode not just reproductive freedoms, but perpetuate a trend as shocking as it is unfortunate of some in this Congress, imposing their theology on our citizens, regardless of other people's own strongly held beliefs and individual needs. Only weeks ago, this Congress, because of a theological clash with science, voted to make it illegal to use potentially life-saving therapies to help with Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other degenerative or traumatic diseases, leaving people crippled and dying.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing legislation that restricts reproductive health choices and discussing its implications for women's health.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
I just have to note that my dear friend from West Virginia, a woman I deeply respect, would have reliance on fossil fuel for energy security. In her own State of West Virginia, the cheapest sources of power are renewable energy sources…
I deeply appreciate the opportunity to join my friends Representatives Mast, Lee, and Joyce in supporting this amendment. Mr. Mast talked about the necessity of providing our veterans with the best possible treatment. I have heard from…
This is not just about extending his presidency, but protecting democracy. While this is a decision for the president and the first lady, I hope they will come to the conclusion that I and others have: President Biden should not be the…





