I have worked my entire life to improve the fairness of the tax code--first in Oregon and now as a member of the House of Representatives. I also know how politics work. It is irresponsible to vote for a massive change without telling the American people how this will impact them. No one knows what would replace the current tax code--who is going to win, who is going to lose, and why. Improving the tax code is of critical importance and I welcome an open national discussion and full congressional debate on the merits of real proposals. However, I cannot support H.R. 3097. But do you wonder why the sponsors of this bill are in such a hurry to eliminate the tax without saying what they would replace it with? They are pushing flat tax or sales tax systems that would reduce taxes for the wealthiest Americans, and raise them for the rest of us. According to the Treasury Department, under Mr. Armey's 17% flat tax, the typical middle-income family would see its federal taxes increase by about $1,500.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing H.R. 3097 and discussing the implications of proposed tax reforms.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
This week we are having a public media summit in our Nation's Capital, with representatives from independent television stations from across the country. Thirteen years ago, the prospects were not particularly encouraging. We had just had…
I appreciate the gentleman from Butler's courtesy. It was my pleasure to sit next to Bill Pascrell for 16 years. We came to Congress at the same time. We entered the Ways and Means Committee at the same time, and he was right there every…
I can speak confidently for House Democrats when I say we are firmly committed to reauthorization of AGOA and HOPE before their expiration next year.
I just have to note that my dear friend from West Virginia, a woman I deeply respect, would have reliance on fossil fuel for energy security. In her own State of West Virginia, the cheapest sources of power are renewable energy sources…





