Tom Cole said...

The president has to sign it, so it can’t be something that he decides he doesn’t want to sign.

That's a no-go, that's a red line that we're not changing our position on and they know that.

I have been a champion on this issue for the past 15 years, since the Supreme Court's 2009 Carcieri v. Salazar decision.

I am trying to figure out what Pacific deterrence initiative actually means nowadays and whether it has the purpose that...