Mr. President, what this amendment does is it ultimately eliminates a State's right to leverage its assets over an amortization schedule that would allow it to expand its highway system. What we are doing is we are taking money we have taken from the States, sending it up here, and saying: If you have an asset in your State--unless you are building a brandnew road--you cannot use that asset to leverage your capital to build more roads in your State. It is against the 10th amendment. It is morally wrong to take away a State's right to enhance its capital assets. I urge a ``no'' vote. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The question is on agreeing to amendment No. 1759.
Share & report
More from Tom Coburn
Mr. President, I move to suspend rule XXII for the purposes of proposing and considering amendment No. 4098, and I ask for the yeas and nays. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Pursuant to the precedent set by the Senate on October 6, 2011…
Mr. President, I submit the following notice in writing: In accordance with Rule V of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby give notice in writing that it is my intention to move to suspend Rule XXII, for the purpose of proposing and…
Mr. President, I first congratulate my colleague from Wisconsin. There is a lot of controversy over lands packages, and her very pleasant example is what isn't controversial. The reason we have a discussion about what is going on is the…
To be most effective, of course, we must have a well-coordinated response at the Federal, State, and local level.





