I stand here today, not as a member of one party or another, not as somebody who readily admits that they are pro-life. I am. But I stand here today as a doctor. Mr. Speaker, I have spent the last 18 years of my life, including a great deal of the time of the last 2 years while I have been in this Congress, caring for women who deliver babies. I have personally been involved in over 3,000 births that I have attended. I have seen every complication and every anomaly that has been mentioned in this debate on partial-birth abortion. I am not standing here as somebody who is pro-life, I am not standing here as somebody that is a freshman Republican. I stand here today to make known to Members that they can vote against an override for only two reasons on this bill. One is that they are totally misinformed of the true medical facts, or that they are pro-abortion at any stage, for any reason. The facts will bear that out. That is not meant to offend anybody. If somebody feels that way, they should stand up and speak that truth. But this procedure, this procedure is designed to aid and abet the abortionist. There is no truth to the fact that this procedure protects the lives of women. There is no truth to the fact that this procedure preserves fertility. There is no truth to the fact that this procedure in fact is used on complicated, anomalous conceptions.
Tom Coburn: “I stand here today, not as a member of one party or another, not as somebody who readily admits that they are pro-life.…”
On the recordSeptember 19, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the medical implications of partial-birth abortion during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Tom Coburn
Jul 13, 2015
We need a drug development system that encourages innovators to pursue breakthrough cures.
Jun 15, 2015
I just do not think it works. And I want to be humane. We have a moral obligation to the least of these, folks who do not have a place to live, but there has got to be a better way to do this.
Apr 26, 2016
the question is--and my advice to the Committee is to look at the roles that the Federal Government has taken over that would be better and more efficiently done at the State level.
Jul 13, 2015
You beat the crap out of them when something goes wrong, so their underlying statement is never do what is best when you can do what is safe.





