I guess my debatable point is the offering of the value, in the judgment of the professionals who are running all of the Department, including the Department of Justice and the DEA, which says it doesn't measure up. That is my point. That is why I brought the amendment. It doesn't denigrate the work of the people there. The fact is, if we are really going to continue to send $30 million to $40 million a year, let's find them something that will give us better value. If we choose not to support this amendment, let's give them direction so that the $30 million or $40 million we do invest actually brings us something that is worth $30 million or $40 million. And it is not the employees there who are at fault. In fact, the direction and the mission has been one that hasn't been accomplished because it wasn't needed in the first place.
Tom Coburn: “I guess my debatable point is the offering of the value, in the judgment of the professionals who are running all of the…”
On the recordSeptember 26, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the value of funding for the Department of Justice and the DEA during Senate debate.
Share
More from Tom Coburn
Aug 1, 2017
As stewards of the Federal purse, we should be ensuring that we are doing all that we can to save taxpayer dollars and create efficiency in Government.
Jun 15, 2015
I thought that was a pretty good idea, and the homeless groups said, in part, in response, 'Well, if you do that, what the appropriators will do is they will'--let us say we had, like $5 as an example, $5 from all the proceeds of all these…
Jun 15, 2015
I just do not think it works. And I want to be humane. We have a moral obligation to the least of these, folks who do not have a place to live, but there has got to be a better way to do this.





