On the recordJuly 25, 2006
it is amazing the way things get twisted. I want to read exactly what Jerome Holmes said in his comments about racial bias. The Senator from Massachusetts just stated that he would ignore reality. Here is what he said in his article. One need not doubt the lingering effects of racism in our society to reject the above claims. Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy and other scholars remind us that racial prejudice still exists in the jury box. He didn't deny it. He said it did. You just heard the opposite of that. What he said is: As an African American, I am among the first to condemn it. We did not hear any of that. And what was just said about what Jerome Holmes wrote, he condemns it. He can't be trusted. That was what we just heard. What you just heard was a litmus test that if he doesn't agree down the line with those who have a completely different political philosophy, he is unqualified. Here is a Black man who has been discriminated against tons in his life. It makes no intuitive sense that he would oppose a jury system that ferreted out racial discrimination. So that is unfounded. His comments on the death penalty, Judge Holmes said we should use DNA but that should come through the legislature as direction, as a directive of the legislative bodies in terms of creating parameters, also, which you would say is to his credit because what he said is: I recognize the limited role of the judiciary in how we make decisions.…
Source
govinfo.gov




