Political Quotes

On the recordNovember 9, 2011
I believe Congress should reexamine the federally mandated medical loss ratios in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Today I will outline four reasons I believe consumers will face increased costs, decreased choice, and reduced competition. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA, included a provision that requires all health plans to adhere to a medical loss ratio, MLR, established in law. The MLR refers to the percentage of premium revenues for health insurance plans spent on medical claims. Thus, if a plan received $100 of premiums and spent $85 on medical claims its MLR would be 85 percent. Beginning no later than January 1, 2011, PPACA requires a health insurance issuer to provide an annual rebate to each enrollee if the ratio of the amount of premium revenue expended by the issuer on clinical claims and health quality costs, after accounting for several factors such as certain taxes and reinsurance, is less than 85 percent in the large group market and 80 percent in the small group and individual markets. Supporters of PPACA tend to herald the newly created, higher MLR requirement as providing ``better value'' for policyholders compared to a lower MLR. To the untrained ear, perhaps higher MLRs sound better since they force health insurance plans are required to spend a larger percentage of each dollar on medical claims.…
Said by
Tom Coburn
Republican · Oklahoma
Source
govinfo.gov
Nov 9, 2011

Share

More from Tom Coburn

Apr 26, 2016

People--if they are not being held accountable, they do not want to be held accountable--and transparency is what holds them accountable.

congress.gov
Sep 16, 2015

It's unclear to what extent the air marshal program is reducing risk to aviation security, despite the more than $820 million annually that is spent on the program.

congress.gov
Jul 21, 2015

We have a very serious problem from the point of view of deterring particularly a country such as Iran or North Korea.

congress.gov
Jul 13, 2015

You beat the crap out of them when something goes wrong, so their underlying statement is never do what is best when you can do what is safe.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation