Where is the study that shows the Federal Government ought to be in the reverse mortgage market? It is not there. Where is the study that shows what will happen to the private mortgage market? It is not there. So what we are doing is moving all reverse mortgages and the obligations thereof to our kids. We ought to let private markets work some. We ought to create that ability. We are going to eliminate that ability. There is no question that reverse mortgages are advantageous for a lot of people. As you heard, there are going to be people preying on widows out there, saying: Here is the FHA, and I can sell you this annuity if you want to reverse mortgage your home. There is not going to be any balance on that. So we are going to shift an entire industry, which should be private, with FHA reserve, for those who need it to help them, to the Government. The long-term consequence by the auditors' report is that it is going to be $45 billion that is going to get shifted to debt to our kids.
Tom Coburn: “Where is the study that shows the Federal Government ought to be in the reverse mortgage market? It is not there. Where…”
On the recordDecember 14, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of government involvement in the reverse mortgage market.
Share
More from Tom Coburn
Apr 26, 2016
That is not partisan. That is just due to the fact that there is not a commitment to reconciliation and working together to get things done.
Jun 15, 2015
I just do not think it works. And I want to be humane. We have a moral obligation to the least of these, folks who do not have a place to live, but there has got to be a better way to do this.
Jul 21, 2015
We have a very serious problem from the point of view of deterring particularly a country such as Iran or North Korea.
Sep 16, 2015
It's unclear to what extent the air marshal program is reducing risk to aviation security, despite the more than $820 million annually that is spent on the program.





