It was in 1215 that King John assented to the First Charter of Liberties. That document, the Magna Carta, read in part: "No free man shall be arrested or imprisoned or in any way victimized, neither will we attack him or send anyone to attack him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land." Each successive generation has endorsed that protection of liberties; in 1628, through the petition of right; in 1679 through the habeas corpus act. These simple principles inspired our own Founding Fathers in 1787 to guarantee these liberties in our own precious Constitution. They wrote these words, article I, section 9: "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended." This "simple" writ of habeas corpus insures that all our constitutional liberties and our own Bill of Rights are enforceable. Why? Because our Founding Fathers knew, from firsthand experience, that a government could and would commit illegal searches. Our Founding Fathers knew, from firsthand experience, that a government could and would force confessions. Our Founding Fathers knew that a government could and would trample an individual's right to a fair trial without effective counsel. Our Founding Fathers also knew one more thing that a right without a remedy is no right at all. My colleagues, let us not be the first generation to fail to uphold that constitution vision. Let us show some political courage. Let us share that vision of 200 years.…
Michael Synar: “It was in 1215 that King John assented to the First Charter of Liberties. That document, the Magna Carta, read in part…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the historical significance of habeas corpus and its importance in protecting individual liberties.
Share
More from Michael Synar
today's vote on assault weapons is about personal responsibility. It is about the personal responsibility each one of us as legislators wrestles with each day we show up for work. Every day we come here to this House and we gather data, we…
What we are concerned about is that the building of orphanages and group housing and tearing families apart is counterproductive to the family values we think both parties stand for. How do you justify the building of orphanages and group…
No, it does not go to welfare recipients. Seventy percent of the Medicaid budget goes to the elderly and disabled. Do you consider them welfare?
I described the philosophy of the Republicans earlier as really the party that wants to cut people off. I think the Democratic Party represents the party of prevention and trying to prevent welfare in the beginning. That is why our party…





