But the bottom line is, if the gentleman totals all of the columns, we are $25 million below 1996. That is the bottom line. As to explaining the difference in the three funds and the shifting of the child survival account, which was not included in the President's request, and the African fund which was left out, then the net effect is that we are $63 million below what the President requested and $25 million below the 1996 level. The gentleman from Indiana ought to know full well that I am not going to increase the President's request on anything. I am cutting the President's request by a billion dollars in this bill.
James T. Callahan: “But the bottom line is, if the gentleman totals all of the columns, we are $25 million below 1996. That is the bottom…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget cuts and funding levels in relation to the President's request.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
The fact is it costs $44,000 a minute to run this House. It would appear to me that every time they talk about reducing a bill by $10,000, if they are going to spend $44,000 of Social Security money, it looks to me like we are losing…
I appreciate where the gentleman is coming from, but this appropriations process is long and involved. We invited every Member of Congress to submit their suggestions to us as to how we could best formulate this bill. The sponsor of this…
I am a free trader I do not deny, and I am quite proud of it, and I have voted for each and every bill they have brought to the floor. But sometimes we have to talk to our own administration and the only chance we have to talk to them…
My question is, to facilitate these multibillionaires who are against this bill, Mr. Speaker, I want an opportunity to offer an amendment which limits the reductions in this tax to the first billion dollars. I think that this will satisfy…





