I have been in meetings during most of the debate. But I did want to come to the floor and bring out one important point, and that is the impact of cost to small businesses in the event that this ergonomic thing is continued as proposed by the Clinton administration. Any small business person would tell us today that their number one problem is even securing workman's compensation. It is very seldom that any major insurance company will insure any business for a period longer than 3 years. They come in, and they give one a rate that seems reasonable. Two years later, they raise that. Three years, they raise it out of the possibility of affordability by small business. So I encourage my colleagues to think what is going to happen. Workman's compensation is going to at least double in cost to small business people, if, indeed, they can get it at all. There is a possibility, because of the extreme changes in coverage as proposed under this regulation, that it could even triple. So when my colleagues are back in their district, think about addressing these small business people who are having to pay these exorbitant costs now, and think about the impact that it is going to cause if, indeed, we do not repeal this through this effort today.
James T. Callahan: “I have been in meetings during most of the debate. But I did want to come to the floor and bring out one important…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of ergonomic regulations on small businesses and workman's compensation costs.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
I might just convey to the audience that might be watching this that this is not an obituary. I am not going to die, and I am not going to go away. I am going to be back again next year because I have no opposition; and, as a result, I am…
Mr. Chairman, I encourage Members to vote no on all three amendments coming up and remind them that last year I think it was a near unanimous vote for the bill which included this exact same language and which the President signed into…
I do it out of principle and I do it in all good faith, not to be critical of the Committee on Rules, not to be critical of their goals, but to express some concerns that I have that I think are very important, and that is aid to Israel…
I understand the details of the project and agree that this project certainly merits congressional support. It is my firm intention to do all that I can to assist the gentleman from California on this very important issue as we move…





