This is not a hearing about a title. This is a hearing about the facts in the case.
Thank you. Let me do a quick follow up statement, finish out talking about the RAC audits.
the goal of this is that it is right the first time, not that we are paying chasing
Still paying people a contingency based on what they find?
Yeah. They are really going in looking for overpayments, obviously, on that.
I would encourage you to keep it as a matter of a great deal of internal discussion so we can try to evaluate it...
As a Federal Government, we are designed to serve the people, rather than them serve us.
The way it is set up.
The appeal rate seems to be extremely high when we are looking for fraud, and we are fighting back and forth...
This is someone we should be serving. We should hold people to account, but we should also be serving them...
I also think that what comes through is that CMS, in conjunction with the Inspector General's Office and GAO, is working...