I do not want it to be misunderstood in any way that the National Archives could consider the United States Constitution a potentially offensive document.
James Lankford: “I do not want it to be misunderstood in any way that the National Archives could consider the United States Constitution…”
Editor's note · Context
Lankford argues against labeling the Constitution as potentially offensive, asserting its importance as a founding document.
Share
More from James Lankford
As the United States engages with Beijing, we cannot forget the millions who have suffered under the CCP or those who continue to live under its repression today.
Hyde was a bipartisan agreement five decades ago, and it has been included in appropriations bills every year since. We should keep that commitment in place.
The U.S. Constitution protects my right to call their rhetoric what it is — racist, ignorant, and antisemitic.
A student who feels called to pastor a church or serve as a missionary should not lose access to student aid because Washington measures the value of that calling by a paycheck.





