Are they assuming this is the detriment to the environment at $40 or are they assuming if we put out a ton of carbon, we are going to have $40 in regulations come down on us?
James Lankford: “Are they assuming this is the detriment to the environment at $40 or are they assuming if we put out a ton of carbon, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Lankford questions the basis of Shell's social cost of carbon estimate.
Share
More from James Lankford
Now, Democrats are committed to finding every way they can to increase the number of abortions in America, including having federal taxpayers pay for elective abortions.
Congress has taken action to ensure taxpayer dollars are not funding organizations that perform abortions, but our work to protect taxpayers and ensure federal law is followed does not stop there," said Lankford.
A student who feels called to pastor a church or serve as a missionary should not lose access to student aid because Washington measures the value of that calling by a paycheck.
Every child is valuable. No American should ever wonder if the check they’re sending to the IRS on April 15 will be used to pay for someone’s elective abortion.





