On the recordApril 11, 2018
The issue about an interpretive rule and whether something is economically significant...
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Lankford emphasizes the complexity of determining economic significance in regulations.
Share & report
More from James Lankford
Dec 20, 2024
Madam President, my friend from Rhode Island and I, we have a lot of great conversations. I think we both agree on the problem here. There is clearly a problem that money could be laundered and hidden in American companies and shell…
Feb 12, 2025
Mr. President, I would ask unanimous consent to be able to use a prop during my speech. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Dec 5, 2024
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Helmy). Without objection, it is so ordered. Corporate Transparency Act
Sep 19, 2024
Mr. President, it is the middle of September. The end of the funding year is actually just over 10 days away. The Senate has brought up exactly zero appropriations bills, although the Committee on Appropriations has worked in a bipartisan…
Other voices in this conversation
