This amendment addresses the Energy Savings Performance Contract Program. It is a program that costs no money. It is all paid for by the savings that are accumulated. This has been cleared on both sides. Everyone is for it. I can't find anyone who is against it. The problem arose when CBO started scoring this after not having scored it. By its very nature, it will not cost any money.
Discussing the Energy Savings Performance Contract Program during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
Senators Vitter, Crapo, Alexander, and I sent a letter to Senator Lautenberg yesterday expressing our disappointment that Republicans' sincere effort to work on a bipartisan TSCA reform had been rebuffed.
During Cheryl's time with the Department of Defense, she worked diligently to ensure every general and flag officer recommended for promotion or appointment was thoroughly vetted prior to a nomination being submitted to the Secretary of…
A free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.
We are proud to honor the achievements of Ms. Cheryl Black, and on behalf of a grateful nation, we salute her 43 years of service to our great Nation. We offer her our thanks and congratulate her on a well-earned retirement…
Other voices in this conversation
