James Inhofe actually said...

"It is my understanding of the Court that they gave the authority to the EPA to do that but not a mandate to do it."

"Without transparency--without the ability of other scientists to replicate your work--you can't have good science."

"Simply put, the report is biased, and therefore the conclusions are skewed to fit a particular viewpoint, or I should say agenda, perhaps."

"As we look at the next 2 years, obviously there are many contentious issues ahead, many issues where we have fundamental disagreements."