On the recordMarch 3, 2015
Mandatory spending would mean that EPA would hand out money with no congressional oversight.
Source
congress.govMandatory spending would mean that EPA would hand out money with no congressional oversight.
Inhofe warns against proposed mandatory spending for the EPA, fearing lack of oversight.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
OK. Michal, first of all, it is nice to see you again. It is kind of funny because we have always gotten along famously in spite of the fact that we disagree probably on more things than we have agreed on, but on the other hand, it has…
I think it needs to be said over and over again by knowledgeable people, such as we have here today, on this overspending, overregulation, the damage that is being done.