On the recordMarch 3, 2015
Mandatory spending would mean that EPA would hand out money with no congressional oversight.
Source
congress.govJim Inhofe: “Mandatory spending would mean that EPA would hand out money with no congressional oversight.”
Editor's note · Context
Inhofe warns against proposed mandatory spending for the EPA, fearing lack of oversight.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
Nov 15, 2022
We are proud to honor the achievements of Ms. Cheryl Black, and on behalf of a grateful nation, we salute her 43 years of service to our great Nation. We offer her our thanks and congratulate her on a well-earned retirement…
Jul 23, 2023
Senators Vitter, Crapo, Alexander, and I sent a letter to Senator Lautenberg yesterday expressing our disappointment that Republicans' sincere effort to work on a bipartisan TSCA reform had been rebuffed.
Sep 27, 2023
A free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.
Nov 15, 2022
For 43 years, Ms. Black has served the Nation with honor and professionalism. Now, as she retires from her position as Deputy Director, General and Flag Officer Matters in the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for…
Other voices in this conversation
