On the recordJune 9, 2015
I would only respond the same as I did to the last one, that the EPA could vacate the bill by making a spurious decision and I would oppose this amendment.
Source
congress.govI would only respond the same as I did to the last one, that the EPA could vacate the bill by making a spurious decision and I would oppose this amendment.
Inhofe expresses opposition to Boxer's amendment regarding the EPA's authority.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
a free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.
I want to thank Mr. Johnson for his comments. It has been a mission of love all these years.
today, I honor a superb leader, liaison and warrior. After 2 years of service as Director of the Navy Senate Liaison Office, Chase Patrick is deservedly moving on and assuming the responsibilities of a rear admiral, lower half. I believe…