Let me correct this again. I had already stated that the statement my good friend from Vermont made was a false statement, inadvertently, in terms of Exxon and what they had paid. I commented that they paid more than $18 billion in the years between 2004 and 2008. He returned and said in 2009 is when they have not paid any. They have already paid $1/2 billion in 2009 in U.S. Federal income tax, and they will not know the final liability until they file a return later this year. So they are still doing it. The information that my good friend has is false. Getting back to the bill and who this affects, it doesn't affect Exxon, BP, and all these giant companies. It is the small producers that will be driven out of business. Without being able to do the deduction of the expenses on manufacturing, if this bill passes, this is going to single out the oil and gas industry, the only industry that does not enjoy the same deductions. They are punitive to this industry because right now it is quite obvious they are trying to exploit the tragedy in the gulf.
Jim Inhofe: “Let me correct this again. I had already stated that the statement my good friend from Vermont made was a false…”
On the recordJune 15, 2010
Editor's note · Context
Senator Inhofe addresses the impact of proposed legislation on the oil and gas industry.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
Nov 15, 2022
During Cheryl's time with the Department of Defense, she worked diligently to ensure every general and flag officer recommended for promotion or appointment was thoroughly vetted prior to a nomination being submitted to the Secretary of…
Sep 27, 2023
a free-market approach to conservation. These areas can be developed, but Federal taxpayers do not underwrite the investments.
Jun 21, 2022
OK. Michal, first of all, it is nice to see you again. It is kind of funny because we have always gotten along famously in spite of the fact that we disagree probably on more things than we have agreed on, but on the other hand, it has…





