On the recordMay 22, 2012
Money that would be coming to the United States, that by virtue of this treaty, would not come to the United States--I call that a tax.
Source
congress.govJim Inhofe: “Money that would be coming to the United States, that by virtue of this treaty, would not come to the United States--I…”
Editor's note · Context
Inhofe argues that treaty implications equate to a tax on the U.S.
Share
More from Jim Inhofe
Jul 23, 2023
Senators Vitter, Crapo, Alexander, and I sent a letter to Senator Lautenberg yesterday expressing our disappointment that Republicans' sincere effort to work on a bipartisan TSCA reform had been rebuffed.
Sep 6, 2022
I really believe that we have an opportunity to yield to the pressures that are out there on overregulation.
Dec 15, 2022
after months of deliberating, just like that, the most important bill we work on every year has passed the Senate. There is an old document that no one reads anymore called the Constitution. It tells us what we are supposed to be doing…
Other voices in this conversation
