On the recordSeptember 15, 2016
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding the adoption of amendment No. 4979, as amended, the following amendments be reported by number, called up, and agreed to en bloc: Isakson No. 5075; Sanders No. 5063, as modified; Cochran No. 5076; Paul No. 5068; Cardin No. 5069; Hoeven No. 5074, as modified; Tester No. 5077; and Sasse No. 5066, as modified. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered. The clerk will report the amendments by number en bloc. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Oklahoma [Mr. Inhofe], for others, proposes amendments numbered 5075; 5063, as modified; 5076; 5068; 5069; 5074, as modified; 5077; and 5066, as modified, en bloc to amendment No. 4979. The amendments are as follows: AMENDMENT NO. 5075 (Purpose: To deauthorize the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam, Georgia and South Carolina) At the appropriate place in section 5001 (relating to deauthorizations), insert the following: (_) New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam, Georgia and South Carolina.-- (1) Definitions.--In this subsection: (A) New savannah bluff lock and dam.--The term ``New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam'' has the meaning given the term in section 348(l)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2630) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act).…





